Autism Projects: Kidney Analysis


The basic premise of the Brimstone Theory is simple: disturbed metabolism of the oxides of sulfur cause autism. In particular, sulfite is not properly processed resulting in low levels of beneficial sulfate in blood. The kidney is responsible for recycling sulfate but is compromised within autism, further complicating matters. A diet rich in sulfate may be preventative. The problem is easy to correct by adding sulfate to water or switching to sulfate rich bottled water. But first, we need to prove the theory is correct. That was one goal of our study of the kidney, which is summarized below from a paper published in June of 2023 by the Biomedical Journal of Scientific and Technical Research.

Autism and Renal Sulfate Transport

Abstract: Sulfate is an important nutrient and enzyme cofactor. Blood sulfate is depressed for individuals with autism, partly due to poor resorption in the kidney. We model the kidney nephron using simple mathematics and examine flowrates, concentrations and resorption along the length of the proximal tubule. Assuming constant resorption, NaS1 transport protein density is examined. Blood levels of sulfite and thiosulfate inhibitors are increased to show their influence on neurotypicals. Then blood sulfate is varied to show how inhibitor levels may be decreased, potentially resulting in symptom relief and improvement of overall health for those on the spectrum. Expression of the NaS1 transport protein is linked to vitamin D and estrogen chemistry, suggesting feedback mechanisms for sulfate homeostasis. Finally, sulfate supplementation and sulfite avoidance are discussed as potential strategies for both the prevention and treatment of autism.

Introduction: Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) affect social interaction, communication, behavior and the senses. In the United States, the prevalence is 1 in 54 for all children and 1 in 34 for boys based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. One characteristic of autism is depressed resorption of sulfate in the kidney leading to high levels in urine and low levels in blood. In this paper, we model the kidney using simple mathematics to examine sulfate flowrates and concentrations. Then the model is used to investigate sulfate inhibitors, sulfate regulation and possible steps to correct imbalances.

An important feature of autism is dysfunctional sulfur metabolism. In particular, the oxides of sulfur are implicated: sulfite, thiosulfate and sulfate. Sulfate may be ingested directly or it may be converted from the amino acid methionine by a series of enzymes including sulfite oxidase. An English study reports the urine of those with autism contains 50 times the sulfite, 7 times the thiosulfate and double the sulfate of neurotypicals. An Arizona study found depressed levels of blood sulfate in those with autism, only 35% of normal in the case of free sulfate. And a French study of nasal stem cells found 91% of those with autism had decreased expression of genes (MOCOS and AOX) within the molybdenum cofactor pathway. This pathway is responsible for several important enzymes including sulfite oxidase. There are 5 upstream genes (MOCS1, MOCS2, MOCS3, NFS1 and GPHN) in this pathway, requiring several cofactors including bioactive vitamin B6 (PLP). Interference with of any of these elements will impair sulfite oxidase enzyme and depress the conversion of sulfite to sulfate as indicated above.

Sulfate within the kidney filtrate is returned to the blood via resorption through proximal tubule membrane cells. This is facilitated by two transport proteins: NaS1 (SLC13A1) sodium-sulfate co-transporter located at the brush border membrane and SAT1 (SLC26A1) anion exchanger located at the basolateral membrane. NaS1 moves sulfate from nephron lumen into kidney membrane cells and SAT1 moves sulfate from membrane cells back into the bloodstream. When operating properly, they help to maintain sulfate blood levels within a healthy range. For those with autism, kidney resorption is partially blocked resulting in urine levels that are double normal and blood levels that are one third normal as reported above.

Simple Model of the Kidney Nephron: The human kidney pair contains approximately one million small tubes called nephrons. As blood passes through tiny pores upon entry, red and white cells are blocked and only plasma passes into the nephron. As this filtrate moves along the small tubes, nutrients are returned to the bloodstream while waste and toxins flow into the urine. The front section of each tube is called the proximal tubule and this region is responsible for the resorption of 65% of the general filtrate and nearly all of the sulfate. The inner brush border membrane of the proximal tubule includes NaS1 transport proteins that move sulfate from the filtrate into the cytoplasm of the cells lining the tube. The outer basolateral membrane includes SAT1 transport proteins which complete the task by moving sulfate from cytoplasm back into the blood. It is generally assumed that NaS1 proteins form the rate limiting step for sulfate transport, therefore this study will consider only flowrates and kinetics for NaS1 transport proteins.

Simple Nephron Model

Figure 1. Simple Model of the Kidney Nephron

As shown in Figure 1, we model the kidney nephron as a tube, beginning with the proximal tubule divided into 10 segments which are followed by an undifferentiated remainder. As filtrate flows down the tube, the concentration of sulfate and its inhibitors varies as they are reabsorbed along with water and other chemicals. The flowrate of chemicals in the filtrate can be specified at the entry and exit points by multiplying the appropriate concentrations by the flowrate of water. For a typical pair of human kidneys, the flowrate of the filtrate (which is mostly water) is 180L/day at the bloodstream entry and about 1.4 L/day at the urine exit.

Noting that 65% of the filtrate is reabsorbed in the proximal tubules along with nearly 100% of sulfate, we can make a few assumptions. Since the filtrate is mostly water, the flowrate of water at the end of all the proximal tubules would be approximately 35% of the blood entry flowrate or 63L/day. Whereas for sulfate, the flowrate at the end of the proximal tubules would be the same as the urine flowrate. And the same would apply to the competitive inhibitors or their combination. Figure 2 plots sulfate concentrations for segments n=1 to n=10. For neurotypicals, sulfate concentrations drop as water is removed more slowly than sulfate in the proximal tubule. Within autism, this effect is countered by the higher levels of sulfate in urine.

Sulfate Concentration for Nephron Segments

Figure 2. Sulfate Concentration for Nephron Segments

Discussion: The concentration profiles in Figure 2 hightlight the differences in kidney function between neurotypicals and those with autism. It seems logical to assume these differences result from variations in the density of sulfate transporters embedded in the surface of the tubule membrane. And this suggests that the expression of NaS1 transport proteins may play an important role in sulfate regulation. If the expression of NaS1 can be properly linked to sulfate levels, a regulatory feedback loop may be established. Pathways relevant to this discussion are shown in Figure 3 that follows.

Simplified Metabolic Pathways

Figure 3. Simplified Metabolic Pathways for Sulfate Regulation

An Australian genetic analysis of NaS1 has identified a Vitamin D responsive element in the promoter region of the gene. And a study of VDR knockout mice with diminished vitamin D receptor expression showed urinary sulfate increased by 42% while blood serum sulfate decreased by 50%. These studies confirm that repression of either vitamin D or its receptor interferes with the NaS1 transporter causing sulfate resorption to decrease. Studies of pregnant women in Sweden have noted Vitamin D (25OHD) deficiency increased autism risk by a factor of 1.58. On the other hand, the Arizona study of blood sulfate previously referenced also tracked vitamins and minerals. For vitamin D, there was very little difference between neurotypicals and children with autism. In fact, those on the spectrum measured about 2% higher. Perhaps this is a clue that the vitamin D receptor (VDR) may be a more likely candidate for regulation of NaS1 and sulfate.

VDR expression is regulated by the hormone estrogen. Estrogen is a family name for several similar chemicals including estrone and estradiol which are the most abundant. Estrone and estradiol may interconvert as needed. Estrone may be removed by  estrone sulfotransferase (EST) to form a sulfate and returned via the enzyme steroid sulfatase (STS). Estrone sulfate acts as a reserve pool allowing regulation of overall estrogen. An important piece of this process is the cofactor sulfate. Without sufficient sulfate, estrone removal via EST is diminished which keeps overall estrogen levels high. This connection to sulfate completes a feedback loop that may play an important part in sulfate regulation.

Regulation of Sulfate via Negative Feedback

Sulfate blood levels drop.
EST is starved for its sulfate cofactor.
Estrone rises which up-regulates VDR expression.
This creates NaS1 proteins that bolster renal sulfate resorption.
Increased resorption raises blood levels of sulfate to maintain homeostasis.

The feedback loop described above may offer insight into sulfate homeostasis which maintains normal serum concentrations in the vicinity of 300uM. Simply put, sulfate levels drop and this leads to enhanced NaS1 expression with increased sulfate resorption. However, simple logic suggests that regulatory feedback within autism must be compromised if overall sulfate resorption is so strongly depressed. For those on the spectrum, average values of sulfate, maximum velocities and protein density are all depressed. Regulatory feedback would try to correct this but fails. Why?

The proposed feedback loop relies on estrone to adjust the density of sulfate transport proteins. When sulfate falls, EST reduces the sulfation of estrone and estrone levels should rise. Of course, this assumes that other paths also feeding estrone remain unaffected. A recent Chinese study of steroid sulfatase (STS) has shown sulfite to be an inhibitor of this enzyme. If sulfite inhbition is significant, STS conversion of estrone sulfate back to estrone would be reduced. This negates increases in estrone required by the sulfate feedback loop. Our analysis has estimated autism blood sulfite would result in a 30% inhibition of STS, disturbing regulatory feedback for those on the autism spectrum.

Conclusion:
Metabolism of sulfur is quite disturbed within autism. Sulfite in urine is 50 times normal while thiosulfate is increased 7 fold. Free sulfate is double in urine and only one third normal in blood. Dysfunctional levels of these oxides of sulfur may be explained by abnormalities within the molybdenum cofactor pathway, which are present in 9 out of 10 children with autism. In turn, these pathway abnormalities interfere with the creation of sulfite oxidase enzyme, necessary for the conversion of sulfite into sulfate. Low sulfate in conjunction with high sulfite and thiosulfate reduces renal resorption, further lowering blood sulfate. Sulfate regulation would help to correct this shortfall but may be compromised by inadequate vitamin D or its receptor (VDR). Higher testosterone and lower estrogen typical in males would reduce the expression of VDR,  possibly explaining why boys are more strongly affected by autism than girls.

In this paper, incomplete published data was augmented by estimates to more fully characterize blood levels and transport properties of sulfate in the kidney. A simple model of the kidney nephron was built assuming constant sulfate resorption along the length of the proximal tubule. Flowrates and concentrations were calculated and plotted, demonstrating how elevated sulfite and thiosulfate could interfere with renal sulfate resorption even in neurotypicals. A feedback mechanism was proposed to explain the regulation of sulfate via vitamin D and estrogen chemistry. It is hoped that this study expands the understanding of sulfur metabolism, leading to autism strategies that increase sulfate, lower sulfite, reduce prevalence and improve treatment. To view the full article, click on the link below.

Autism and Renal Sulfate Transport



  Hosted by
Rybett Controls

Next Topic